Saturday, October 17, 2020

Newhart season 7

Of the sitcoms I’ve profiled at this blog, some emerged out of the gate fully formed (Murphy Brown, Bewitched). Others took a while to get their bearings: to figure out how to most successfully showcase the characters and mine the comedy. And that’s not that unusual. A whole lot of promising sitcoms don’t catch fire till Season 2; the first season is a bit of a learning curve for the writers, and come Season 2— if the show is filmed before a live audience — you get to share in the audience’s exhilaration, when it’s apparent to all that the show has been (sometimes only subtly, but nonetheless momentously) transformed, and the laughs have blissfully multiplied. And then there are the shows that don’t reach maturity till a little later. Both The Mary Tyler Moore Show and Designing Women become the best versions of themselves in Season 3: the former through a soft reboot, the latter through a careful rebalancing act.

But how about a sitcom that becomes the very best version of itself in Season 7? How often does that happen? Newhart most assuredly does, and part of that is that the show is a late bloomer. In fact, if you think of Newhart, Bob Newhart’s second successful sitcom (following his ‘70s hit The Bob Newhart Show), you’re unlikely to think of the first two seasons at all. The first season premiered in 1982, and — in addition to Newhart (as Vermont innkeeper Dick Loudon, an author of how-to books newly transplanted from New York City), Mary Frann (as his wife Joanna) and Tom Poston (as handyman George Utley) — the cast included Steven Kampmann as their next-door neighbor Kirk Devane and Jennifer Holmes as their maid Leslie Vanderkellen. By Season 2, Holmes — who’d made little impression — was replaced by Julia Duffy as her deliciously self-absorbed cousin Stephanie; Kampmann was written off at the end of Season 2, and Peter Scolari, who’d made two appearances that season as TV producer Michael Harris (one of the medium’s first portrayals — and satires — of a yuppie, a term that had only recently come into use), was upped to series regular come Season 3. By Season 3, Michael and Stephanie were (perfectly) paired, and Dick — in addition to writing how-to books — was now hosting a local Sunday talk show called Vermont Today. By Season 3, Newhart starts to feel like the show we all remember.

So consider Season 3 of Newhart — under new showrunner Dan Wilcox — its inaugural season, and consider Season 4 the season when everything starts to click (its own Season 2, just two seasons late): when the cast really begins to gel, and the writers learn how to mine the character quirks for maximum effect. Audiences and critics took notice (TV Guide marveled at how the series had been reupholstered and rejuvenated), and that season, Newhart and two of his supporting players (Duffy and Poston) were nominated for Emmys, the first time that had happened. And when Wilcox decided to leave at the end of the season, David Mirkin and Douglas Wyman — who’d been staff writing for a few years — took over the reins, and the show was put to its toughest test. For a few seasons, it had been comfortably nestled between Kate & Allie and Cagney and Lacey, in an unassuming 9:30 slot. At the top of Season 5, it was moved up a half-hour, to the tentpole slot, and industry wags were doubtful it was up to the challenge. But Newhart surprised them, holding on to all of its audience from the previous season, and actually scoring its best seasonal ranking since its debut season. At the end of Season 5, the show was rewarded with five Emmy nominations, for Newhart and all of the supporting players save Frann, plus a writing nod.

Mirkin and Wyman’s Newhart was tougher and leaner than Wilcox’s; it’s not a style that plays as well today as it did then — it’s a little heartless — but in 1986, it seemed invigorating. But by the new showrunners’ second season, you could feel a bit of a malaise setting in. It was the same writing staff, but they seemed tired. Mirkin admitted, “I received an Emmy nomination for writing [the fifth season opener, “Co-Hostess Twinkie,” guest-starring Julie Brown], but then this horrible thing happened. I was there for about four years, and I realized that I had sort of ‘done’ the multi-camera sitcom. I was chaffing at its limitations.” And sure enough, you see it on the screen. Mirkin’s last scripted episode depicts a series of dreams by, in turn, Dick, Stephanie, Michael and finally Larry, Darryl and Darryl, the countrified trio (and audience favorites) who had moved in next door when Kirk departed. The final act is devoted to Larry dreaming that he and his brothers guest on The Tonight Show. It’s undeniably funny, but it’s also symptomatic of a showrunner who has very little left to say about the characters. You sense throughout Season 6 that the writing team is tired, and running shy on inspiration. In Season 5, during November sweeps, they’d devoted a two-parter to Stephanie and Michael falling out, when he takes an interest in another woman. Their impasse — brief as it was — felt exhilarating. The following November sweeps was devoted to another Michael-Stephanie two-parter, in which they once again sense something amiss in the status of their relationship. They decide to get married — then don’t. Sitcoms in the 1980’s, of course, weren’t dynamic and serialized as they are today (unless there was a built-in will they/won’t they component, a la Sam and Diane); changes to the status quo were rare. But nonetheless, Newhart finished its sixth season feeling very much like a series treading water.

That was my observation at the time; little did I know it was shared by the cast. But when I got around to writing this essay, and did a little research, I learned the cast had expressed concerns as well. In the syndicated Gannett News, Scolari had confessed, following Season 6, “We went for a lot of readily accessible laugh material last year.” Occasionally the cast felt like they were going through their paces “by rote. As the end of the season came, and we began to wind down, we thought, you know, maybe we’re trying to go to the well once too often here, or recreate our greatest hits.”

Mirkin and Wyman departed after Season 6 — pretty much all the writers did — and CBS, for the first time in the show’s history, brought in an outside team to showrun: Mark Egan and Mark Solomon, fresh off three seasons producing the hit Linda Lavin starrer Alice. CBS clearly recognized that Newhart needed an infusion of fresh blood. The start of Season 7 was delayed by a writer’s strike, and the first Newhart episode didn’t air until late October, and in a new 8 PM timeslot. It was a solid effort by Dan O’Shannon and Tom Anderson, two of the new staff writers, in which, when a prisoner uses one of Dick’s how-to books to escape, the town decides all of his books should be burned. It was a good choice for season opener, a situation where Dick could serve as a lone voice of sanity in an increasingly daffy town, but it didn’t suggest any kind of turnaround for the show. Newhart seemed very much like a series whose best years were behind it. Two weeks later, Murphy Brown premiered (in Newhart’s old 9 PM timeslot), and a few weeks after that, Designing Women began its third season (in Newhart’s old, old 9:30 timeslot) and really caught fire. It seemed clear that they were the future of TV comedy, at least on CBS.

There are some strong and promising episodes among the early Season 7 entries — and solid introductions to the new writers: Billy Van Zandt and Jane Milmore score with “Goonstruck” (Duffy's personal favorite episode of the series), in which Stephanie finds herself smitten with the stonemason replacing the inn’s fireplace; Bob Bendetson delivers a sturdy piece of writing when Dick finds himself the foreman of a jury in “Twelve Annoyed Men and Women,” which had the added bonus of introducing town librarian Miss Goddard (Kathy Kinney, pre-Drew Carey). But still, this appears to be the fate of Newhart in its twilight years: the occasional lively episode in a sea of standard standalones.

And then something odd happens when episode 9 rolls around: Michael loses his producing gig at WPIV — and doesn’t get it back by episode’s end. On the contrary, for someone like Michael Harris, whose sole skills are a snappy delivery, a gift for alliteration, and a way of turning every greeting into a pun, the best job he can find in the tiny town of Stratford, VT, is at a local retail store, Circus of Shoes. Within a few episodes, Michael is struggling to afford the lifestyle to which Stephanie has grown accustomed. He shows up at the inn with a tiny boxed gift for his “Cupcake,” who — seeing it — comes skipping down the stairs:

Stephanie: Ooh, a gift. You remembered!
Michael: Well, natch. Any suitor worth his salt knows that Cupcake Day comes but once a year.
Joanna: I don’t believe I’ve heard of Cupcake Day.
Stephanie: Michael created it for me two years ago to help fill that long void between Valentine’s Day and Easter when I didn’t get any presents.
Joanna (ironically): I wish I’d known. I haven’t even begun my Cupcake Day shopping.
Stephanie: Don’t worry about it. There’s a three-day grace period.
Michael: Since I’m in this minimal monetary mode, instead of the traditional diamond trinket, I opted for something a bit more... symbolic.

It’s a cupcake. And Stephanie does not take it well.

Joanna: Stephanie, Michael has been going through some hard times.
Stephanie (to Michael, disheartened): Well, how I am supposed to get in the holiday spirit when you give me something like this on the second holiest day of the year?

Guilted and humbled, Michael offers to take her to their favorite restaurant, Maison Hubert. But when his credit card is rejected, Stephanie is forced to ask for money from a snobbIsh couple across the room, who manage to make her feel smaller than she already does. (Stephanie: “Please, Mr. Wallingford, don’t make me beg. I’m not good at it.” Mrs. Wallingford: “I think you’re marvelous at it, dear.") And Michael’s only recourse is to show up at the inn the following day with a gift box ten times as large as the last one — and a promise to do better. (“They’re letting me work double shifts at the shoe store, and for extra money, the owner said he’d train me to become a cobbler. It’s a lost art.” Dick: “Yeah, I mean, when you think about, where are the young cobblers coming from?”) Stephanie’s bounce restored, she exits up the stairs to open her gift; she’s barely out of sight before Michael doubles over in desperation, rattling out his lines at double speed.

Michael: Dick, I need twenty grand fast.
Dick: What?
Michael: OK, eighteen.
Joanna: Michael, we don’t have that kind of money.
Michael: Don’t plead poverty with me, doll! I’m late on my mortgage, I’ve missed my last two Turbo Z payments, I’ve got the repo man rapping at my door, and I just wrote a bum check to pay for that gift. I’m drowning! (He starts to sob all over the front desk.)
Dick: Michael, we’d like to help you.
Joanna: You see, our money is tied up in the inn.
Michael: Then — sell it.
Dick: We’re not going to sell the inn to support your extravagant lifestyle.
Michael: And here I was thinking I could count on you when things got tough. I guess you don’t know the meaning of friendship. (Screaming) You should look it up sometime!

He sobs even louder, then Stephanie emerges in black mink, overjoyed with her new gift. Dick and Joanna glare at Michael, who beats a hasty retreat. And the audience, understandably, howls. The show is more alive than it’s been in years. And after a chance meeting with the town shrink at the shoe store (and after losing that job, because he stopped to talk to the shrink), Michael realizes he has to break up with Stephanie; as he tells her, “This is only the tip of my topple. But I’m not going to drag you down with me.” And as with his firing at WPIV, there are no quick fixes by episode’s end. Newhart is in uncharted waters.

“Cupcake on My Back” is a great script by Egan, Solomon, Van Zandt and Milmore, but a recitation of the lines only tells half the story. Scolari puts spins on them that aren’t on the page, ones you can’t help but marvel at. Unexpected syllables accented for maximum effect; whole speeches delivered under a veil of comic desperation and tears. These episodes charting Michael's downward spiral do wonderful things for the cast. Not just for Scolari and Duffy, but especially for them. Scolari reveals all of the anguish and fear of failure that lurk beneath Michael’s happy-go-lucky facade. From the moment he loses his job — and basically, his sense of self — he goes to pieces. And Stephanie has no idea how to adjust to the new status quo, as she makes her way through her own stages of grief: “first denial, then shopping, then hating the other person’s guts so much you want to see them fry in the flames of eternal hell — then more shopping.” In the episodes following the breakup, Duffy conveys more honest outrage and vulnerability than in the five years prior.

In Season 5, when Stephanie confronted Michael’s new girlfriend Susan, and was met with a litany of things Michael and Susan had in common, she countered, “The things that Michael and I share go much deeper, like fashion.” In Season 6, when Michael proposed, in order to alleviate the sameness that had crept into their relationship, Stephanie took no time to ponder the gravity of the moment; her instant, instinctive response was “a wedding might be fun.” Two big laugh lines from the two big Michael and Stephanie two-parters, and they're funny — but ultimately, they speak to an issue that grew frustrating as the show settled in for a long run. Michael and Stephanie were amusing because they were paper-thin, because — as the saying goes — down deep, they were shallow. But after four seasons, that became limiting and rather irritating. Was that all there was to their relationship? Were they truly in love? Did they matter to each other? In Season 7 we learn the answers, and the show actually gets funnier for telling us. Delving deeper into Stephanie and Michael’s relationship doesn’t undermine the laughs; on the contrary, it amplifies them. It triples them.

And by the time the Michael-Stephanie story arc kicks into high gear, it’s like we’ve been walking over a minefield we didn’t know was there. In “One and a Half Million Dollar Man,” easily a series highlight, a half-dozen plotlines — including Joanna’s new real estate job, introduced seven episodes earlier; Michael’s ongoing quest for cash, which began six episodes earlier; the return of society snob Scooter Drake, first seen four episodes earlier; and Maison Hubert, introduced three episodes earlier — converge to steer Michael (now plying his trade as a street performer) into a very public meltdown. Two weeks earlier, Murphy Brown had stolen the Monday night spotlight with the introduction of Colleen Dewhurst as Murphy’s mother Avery, in the Emmy-winning “Mama Said”; a week later, Designing Women had garnered acclaim with what many — including myself — label its finest episode, “Full Moon" (in which Julia “moons Atlanta”). But on March 20, 1989, the spotlight was on Newhart, in an episode so daring and unprecedented, it was written up nationwide. (One syndicated column carried the headline "Can a nervous breakdown be funny?" The answer is yes — and also noisy and messy and altogether unsettling. In 1973, Mary Tyler Moore had won plaudits and an Emmy Award for an episode in which she was subjected to public humiliation. Critics lauded her as one of the rare stars to hold themselves up to ridicule: not slapstick ridicule a la Lucille Ball, but the kind that genuinely hurts. Peter Scolari kicks it up a couple dozen notches. I'm not one to watch award shows, let alone make proclamations that someone "was robbed" of a much-deserved win, but offhand, I can't think of a snub that bothers me more than Scolari losing the Emmy in 1989.) At the time, I was enthralled by the episode, but also unnerved. I had never seen a traditional sitcom do anything like it: chart a core character’s collapse in such a raw, painful yet sadistically funny fashion. It got under my skin as few TV episodes had.

When they took over the reins of Newhart in the fall of 1988, Egan and Solomon told the press that, in their opinion, the show “had become a little bit more of a sketch every week rather than stories out of the human condition, out of actual conduct and behavior." (Totally accurate.) Their goal was to “get to the human element.” (Scolari chimed in, with regard to Michael and Stephanie, "I think our audience is entitled to a little more out of these people who make references to baked goods all the time.") And miraculously, that’s just what they do. Once again, I didn’t see that interview — or those particular quotes — until I was researching this essay, but they corroborated everything I’ve long felt about Season 7. (For younger readers here, we didn’t have that thing called “the internet” back in 1988, so you could love a TV series, read everything about it that came your way, and still miss a lot.) How rare is it that a pair of showrunners come onto a long-running series, state their goals, and actually meet them? By Season 7, shows are often operating under the weight of their own machinery; they can be lumbering creatures, difficult to rouse, let alone rejuvenate. But Egan and Solomon do just that, triumphantly. From episode 9 on, there’s a sense of stakes being raised — of characters suffering genuine consternation and, on occasion, humiliation. And as a result, the characters get at once crazier and richer — an impressive combination. Pushed to the brink, they grow more manic, but reveal shadings and motivations and simple truths that had been hidden away.

Once Michael loses his job, the quality of the scripts picks up dramatically. The writers by now have a clear understanding of the characters, and they seem energized by the opportunity to infuse the static sitcom format with a serialized thread. Every third or fourth episode addresses and advances Michael and Stephanie’s relationship, but even in the interim episodes, the change to the status quo is felt. Scolari and Duffy don’t threaten to take over the show; on the contrary, there are splendid showcases for everyone. A few weeks after Michael loses his job at WPIV, he’s unable to accompany Stephanie to a gala in New York City (he has to work late at the shoe store), so Dick takes his place. It’s a tour-de-force for Newhart, who finds his character seduced by high society, to the point where he’s upstaging Merv Griffin on a duet to “My Little Grass Shack,” and playing willing accomplice to Stephanie’s boastful exaggeration of his achievements. When one of the guests, informed that Dick owns a string of luxury hotels across the globe, insists, “The next time we weekend in Bimini, we’ll have to stay at your resort,” Dick is at a loss for words: “I don’t... I don’t recall having a hotel in Bimini.” But when Stephanie prompts him — “You know the one, Richard: the small one, on the bluff”— he picks up his cue eagerly: “Oh, the bluff one...“

With Michael and Stephanie on the outs, the writers are able to pair the principals in unexpected ways. In the episode after Michael loses his job at Circus of Shoes, he’s so anxious for a home-cooked meal — any home-cooked meal — that he accompanies Joanna to a dinner party at Larry, Darryl and Darryl’s that she can’t get out of. As George helps Stephanie drown her sorrows in cheap liquor, and Dick offers a commencement speech at a local school that isn’t quite what it appears, Joanna and Michael try to get through an evening at Larry, Darryl and Darryl’s without, as Joanna fears, “eating beetle.” (When Larry announces they’ll be bringing out the finger sandwiches, Joanna — anticipating the worst — frantically improvises, “You know what I like doing after cocktails? Holding our hands up to make sure all our fingers are there.” Larry to his brothers, after dutifully obeying: “Wonder what she’ll do when we serve the rump roast?”)

Through the course of the evening, we learn that the three brothers discuss politics and play classical piano. Even Larry, Darryl and Darryl get an upgrade in Season 7. Before the season started, there was speculation that they’d be featured more, to take advantage of the show’s earlier time slot, in what was still called “the family viewing hour.” (Solomon was quick to put that rumor to rest. He and Egan would maintain “a 9 PM level of humor.”) On the contrary, they don’t become more prominent; they’re eased into the ensemble — they become part of the texture of the show — so that episodes don’t have to revolve around them to feature them. And at the same time, they’re no longer merely backward rubes. In the episode where Dick and Stephanie are off in New York City, the remaining characters hold an all-night vigil in the lobby of the inn, hoping to get a look at a mysterious guest named L. Gardner, who checked in unseen and has eluded them for days. Is this L. Gardner male or female? As it turns out, both the Darryls have caught a glimpse. When one of them mimes a woman’s shape and the other a man’s, Larry is left to interpret: L. Gardner can only be “a swing dancer from a road company of the lilting Jerry Herman musical La Cage Aux Folles.” (George: “I was so far off.”) The writers have a delicious time suggesting that the brothers hail — and mysteriously fell — from privilege. By the end of the season, we’ll learn that they attended the opening of Phantom, and that Johnny Carson pays their utility bill. Season 7 broadens them as neatly as it does the rest of the cast.

Which brings us to the cast member who, aside from Scolari, benefits the most from Season 7: Mary Frann. There’s an awful lot right about Season 7, but it might well be the re-emergence of Mary Frann that's the most pure fun to watch. The previous showrunners scripted the series as if they hated her (and it was rumored that Newhart himself had little affection for her); reduced to set-dressing, she'd go whole episodes without a decent line, or Merkin and Wyman would do "special episodes" spotlighting the regular cast (e.g., the aforementioned "A Midseason's Night Dream") and pass over her completely.

From the first episode of Season 7, Egan and Solomon set out to make Frann a useful comedic force, and their efforts are not merely apparent, but gratifying. In the season opener, Stephanie ignores and insults a guest, who graciously notes to Joanna, “Good help is hard to find.” "We wouldn’t know,” she confesses, with a smile and a delivery that manage to be at once warm, caustic and self-pitying. The audience laughs in delight: laughter because the line is funny; delight because of who’s saying it — Frann has barely had a clever comeback in two years. (I noticed the change at the time, and was overjoyed.) As the season progresses, we see Joanna grow — almost despite herself — just as loony as everyone else in the town. During the all-night vigil for L. Gardner, Michael turns up, as in need of nourishment as ever: “Any French fries on the fryer, or fresh fruit in the fridge?” “I hate to hear myself say this,” Joanna replies, rolling her eyes at what’s to come, and at what she’s becoming, “but I’m afraid I can find a few frozen frankfurters in the freezer in front of the Fettuccine Alfredo from Friday.” And the audience roars. Roars and claps. The remodeling of Joanna Loudon, former comedic foil, has begun.

Egan and Solomon seem to find their inspiration for this new Joanna in a Season 4 episode, Barton Dean’s “Oh, That Morocco,” in which Joanna — feeling that she’s missing a sense of community in Vermont — got involved with a historical society that turned out to be a witches coven. That eagerness to belong is crucial to Egan and Solomon’s design. Frann was the only Newhart regular never to receive an Emmy nomination (her co-stars all had multiple nods), so it's a little daring where the showrunners ultimately turn for laughs: they play up Joanna's need for attention and acceptance. It could have come off as cruel — us not knowing where Joanna began and Frann left off — but instead, it's inspired: it taps into Frann's comedic strengths, and gives Newhart another crazy to play off of. And Frann looks so pleased to be trading quips with the rest of the cast that her pleasure is contagious. You can hear it in the audience response, which is not only amused but surprised: they don't expect her to be funny. (By the series’ memorable finale, she’s been so completely engulfed by her quest to fit in and her need to be noticed that, when a Japanese conglomerate purchases the entire town, she starts dressing like a geisha and gossiping in Japanese with the hired help.)

Here's Dick and Joanna after Scooter Drake, who’s looking to acquire property in Vermont, has offered them a million-five for their inn:

Dick: I know it's a lot of money, but I don't know if I can bring myself to sell this place.
Joanna: If we did, we'd be set for life. And do you have any idea what my commission would be?
Dick: Joanna, the seller pays the commission. You'd be paying yourself.
Joanna: Who cares? The important thing is, it'll put me in the million-dollar bracket at the office. I'll get a pin!
Dick: Oh well, let's dump this place if it means your getting a pin...

Suddenly they're Burns and Allen.

Season 7 of Newhart has so many highlights — in addition to the eight episodes noted above, there are three more absolute classics: "The Nice Man Cometh,” with Newhart’s buddy Don Rickles as a new talk-show host hired by WPIV, who seizes upon Dick as his stooge; “Murder at the Stratley,” in which Dick, having penned a roman à clef about a murder in a Vermont inn, becomes a prime suspect when Joanna goes missing; and “Malling in Love Again,” in which Stephanie and Michael, resigned to being apart, resolve to find each other ideal matches — at the mall. But let’s focus briefly, as this essay winds down, on one of my favorite unheralded entries: Bob and Howard Bendetson’s Joanna-centric "Homes and Jo-Jo." It starts during a filming of Vermont Today, with an inspired bit involving Newhart and a parrot named Petey (you have to see it to fully appreciate it, and should). Joanna is there to offer moral support, and the new station owner Mr. Grad is there, as always, to tear down Dick:

Grad: Let me tell you something about TV. It’s not radio. The audience wants to see people who are great-looking, with killer smiles.
Dick: Like Petey.
Grad: I had great hopes for him.
Dick: You may call me a radical, but I think people want to watch shows that have content,
Grad (amused): Dick, do you ever think before you speak? I could give Joanna a show, and she’d get better ratings than you.
Joanna: Oh, that’s very flattering, but I wouldn’t know the first thing about hosting a show.
Dick: Honey, he’s not saying he’s going to give you a show. He’s just saying he’d pick you over me and Petey.
Grad: Now wait a minute: that’s not such a bad idea, giving you a show. I mean, you’re great looking and.... (an idea) Smile for me. (She smiles, broadly.) You’ve got a killer smile.
Joanna: Thank you. You should hear me laugh.
Grad: Laugh for me. (She laughs, eagerly.) That’s marvelous. Joanna, what do you do at the inn?
Joanna: Well, I do the books...
Grad: There you go!
Dick (incredulous): You’re going to give her a show where she smiles and laughs and total receipts?
Grad: You think it needs more?
Joanna (not about to give up): Well, I’m also a real estate agent.
Grad: Bingo! That’s the show! And I’m going to try you out in Dick’s timeslot.
Dick: What?
Joanna: Oh, I couldn’t do that to Dick. (A pause.) Could I, honey?
Dick: No!

You get the sense Joanna would sell her own mother for a shot in the spotlight. But they work out a compromise: Joanna will take the timeslot before Dick’s. The resulting show, Your House Is My House — in which Joanna offers virtual tours of available homes in the area — is going well, until the station owner, in a quest for ratings, turns it into the salacious Hot Houses, complete with a libidinous male co-host whose patter goes way beyond innuendo. (His response to Joanna’s description of a new home’s kitchen: “Ever sprawl naked on a granite countertop?”) Stephanie comments on Joanna's latest episode, “After Joanna's flesh act, I had to take a ritual purification bath." Joanna insists, "I was selling real estate," but George admits, "It was hard to say what you were selling." And Dick, who should be outraged at the sight of another man fondling and ogling his wife onscreen, is so pleased that her high viewing figures are boosting his own that he’s disinclined to upset the status quo. (Joanna: “Thank you for letting your wife be degraded for some stupid ratings.” Dick: “Joanna, normally I would be the last guy to stand by and let you be degraded, but I mean, you know, it’s sweeps week.”) As Joanna fumes and storms across the WPIV soundstage, her angry stride unconsciously in time to the sax-driven Hot Houses theme song, Frann is a marvel: statuesque and stunning, with that gift for seemingly perpetual outrage that Carole Lombard once exuded. Never sexier than when angry, never funnier than when indulging her own self-delusions.

It was so common — and too easy — for critics in the '80s to reduce Frann to "she's no Suzanne Pleshette” (Newhart’s wife from his previous sitcom). No, she wasn't — did she have to be? Forget recasts from Dick Sargent on, I think Mary Frann had the toughest shoes to fill, and she could never catch a break. Until Season 7. Season 7, as joyously surprising, riotously funny and genuinely disturbing now as it was then. If you’ve never seen Newhart, Season 7 is well worth a look, and an easy place to jump right in; just be a little patient with the first third — the final two thirds more than make up for it. And if you watched Newhart, but bailed before the final two seasons (as CBS bounced it around the schedule), rest assured that in Season 7, it's still the same fabulous fruitcake of a series that you remember: only nuttier and richer than it was.


Do you enjoy in-depth looks at hit shows? If so, I delve into Rhoda Season 3, Maude Season 2, WKRP in Cincinnati Season 4 and Bewitched Season 2; serve up my 10 Best Mary Tyler Moore Show episodes and my 10 Best Designing Women episodes; pen an appreciation of the underrated Mike & Molly; and offer up some thoughts as to why The New Adventures of Old Christine took such a tumble in quality over its five seasons. Or if you have prefer dramas, check out my write-ups of Criminal Minds Season 8, Judging Amy Season 6, Voyager Season 4, Gilmore Girls Season 7 (and the subsequent Netflix miniseries), Cold Case Season 4, and fourteen essays devoted to each season of the great nighttime soap Knots Landing. I also look back at Murder, She Wrote and pick out The 10 Best "Murder She Wrote" Mysteries -- not (necessarily) my top episodes, but the best whodunnits.

18 comments:

  1. Very happy to see a new post and especially happy that it is about a sitcom I loved as a kid that has a feel to it that is unlike most other sitcoms.

    The whimsy nature of NEWHART is simply lovely and despite how much I love Bob Newhart and his style, I much more responded to him here in this setting, even though I loved that the show reverted back to him as Bob Hartley in that finale.

    I do want to make a comment about Mary Frann (who was supposedly the original Sue Ellen and the one Michael Filerman wished had remained). I think she was quite lovely in the role and even if she wasn't Suzanne Pleshette, she was still a very warm presence on the show.

    Julia Duffy was robbed of an Emmy or two. Frankly (as much as I loved CHEERS), I think Rhea Perlman won maybe 2 Emmys too many and I am not sure Bebe Neuwirth deserved more than one. I think Neuwirth should hand one of hers to Duffy while Perlman should hand one to Duffy and another to Estelle Getty.

    I also want to comment on David Mirkin. It is interesting to hear how trapped he felt in the traditional sitcom format considering he would go on to be a very key showrunner on THE SIMPSONS for seasons 5 and 6.

    Prior to season 5, THE SIMPSONS had more of a surprising sentimental streak amongst its more cynical and subversive side. Once Mirkin took over, he brought in new writers (among them the great Greg Daniels) who had the insurmountable task of replacing a couple of heavy hitting writers (including the show's original Golden Child: Sam Simon, longtime late night host Conan O'Brien, and the writing duo of Jay Kogen & Wallace Wolodarsky).

    Mirkin was known for making the show bigger in scope and more biting in tone (such as the famous episode where Homer goes to Space), but by Season 6, he arguably gave us one of the greatest seasons of THE SIMPSONS...if not, THE greatest.

    Mirkin managed to balance some of the more sweeter sides of the show in Season 6 while still adding his own style to keep the show feeling fresh. Even though the writing team that followed him in season 7 would arguably improve upon his work even more in some ways, Mirkin was obviously a writer who wanted to experiment and you can see him finally getting to do so after slipping out of the three camera sitcom format.

    It's been years since I've watched an episode of NEWHART but I still think back on it fondly as a show that just made me feel at home.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It’s always so interesting, when I write these essays, to realize after the fact, from the comments, the things I’ve omitted. Because I always write from the writers' perspective, I don’t always give the actors their due, and although I think I do well by Scolari and Frann in this essay, I definitely don’t say enough about Julia Duffy, and I thank you. You are absolutely right. Duffy losing all of her nominations, and four of them to Rhea Perlman (yeesh), is ludicrous. Scolari lost this particular year to Woody Harrelson, but that was coming off four consecutive wins for John Larroquette, which seems as ludicrous as Perlman. But even then, the Emmys loved their repeat winners; the voters didn’t have to think much. Season 7 is a phenomenal body of work by Duffy. It’s not that you didn’t think she had it in her. You knew full well she had it in her; you just never imagined the series would give her the kind of showcase that it did, and allow her character that range of expression.

      FYI, I too prefer Newhart to The Bob Newhart Show. It’s not even close for me. I was a devoted Mary Tyler Moore Show fan, but I don’t even remember if I watched half the Bob Newhart episodes. I thought the supporting players were fine, but I never found their characters very interesting, and I don’t think their characters lent themselves to story. Unlike the Newhart supporting cast, who could always handle whole episodes – and in the case of Season 7, whole story arcs – by themselves. And as you note, the show itself had a feel and a flavor quite unlike any sitcom on the air.

      I am mortified to say that I really don't know Mirkin's work on The Simpsons, as I didn't watch after the first three or four seasons (gasp!). I really need to check out the essays on your own blog again.

      Delete
    2. I am planning on writing a post for each of the Golden Age seasons of THE SIMPSONS so that means I need to tackle 2-8 next and then I may tackle 9-10 as that’s when the show began to crack before crumbling a little more in 11-12.

      Rhea Perlman probably deserved one Emmy for that role (Larroquette I’m less upset about because I think he’s one of the best at playing a comic jackass) but the fact that Duffy never won is truly a crime. She joins an esteemed group of actors who never got to win for a truly wonderful role.

      I still remember her line deliveries on even the most basic of moments, even in the series finale when she sees Joanne in the Japanese get-up: “Well aren’t you gonna introduce us to your lovely new wife?” And then when she comments on the big wig: “It looks so real...”

      She is a gem. I also love her guest appearance on CHEERS when she played Diane’s stuffy friend who wants to sleep with Sam: “Oh Diane...you’ve always been able to see through my facade of gaiety”.

      I should write up CHEERS at some point.

      Delete
  2. Since I asked you to write this essay, I wanted to leave my first comment on this blog, and say thank you, and I thought it was one of your best. And that said, how could you write 15,000 words and not quote “Murder at the Stratley"? “Who wants Clamato juice? Hands!” “Blow out the candle, your hair looks like hell!“ “A murderer *and* a lousy host.“ “Isn’t there a reason you’d pull over by the lake and find her pullover by the lake?” “He could hear a pig drop.“ “What’s that up the road – a head.” The most quotable episode ever.

    Although “One and a Half Million Dollar Man” is a close second.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, when my husband tells me to write an essay, I dutifully obey – even if it takes me a year. :) And you’re correct, of course, that “Murder at the Stratley” is the single most quotable episode ever, as evidenced by the number of times we quote from it on a daily basis. But frankly, by the time I got to that part of the essay, I had quoted so many exchanges, I didn’t think the reader could bear any more. I think my biggest regret is not being able to weave in “they’re in the car.”

      Delete
  3. Hey Tommy! After a killer week of work I finally had a chance to read your essay. As always, I am glad I did (and annoyed at the bicycle industry for keeping me away for so long).

    I will admit that I did not watch Newhart. I caught some episodes of the first season and it just didn't grab my attention. And (unlike you and Anthony), I did prefer The Bob Newhart Show.

    Part of my affection is down to the goofy supporting characters (even though they aren't enough to actually drive a story). The other part of my affection is that reruns were broadcast at 11:00 pm while I was in college. So after a long day of scholarly and erudite discussions of arts and literature, we would gather 'round the telly for a session of "Hi Bob." :-)

    Anyway...as is usually the case, your essay has piqued my interest. I'll have to track down season seven and give it a chance. Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob, dude, we gotta get you watching all this '80s television I'm now learning that you missed: first 'Designing Women," and now 'Newhart'! :) In terms of 'Newhart,' though, you're absolutely right. I too did not find the first season very interesting; I too watched a couple episodes and didn't continue. It wasn't until the show got nestled between 'Kate & Allie' and 'Cagney and Lacey' that I gave it another shot, and saw that it was a very different show by then. Distinctive in a way that I honestly never felt 'The Bob Newhart Show' was. I'll get brickbats for saying it, but 'The Bob Newhart Show' always felt to me like a B+ version of 'The Mary Tyler Moore Show,' whereas once it got going in, say, Season 4, 'Newhart' wasn't quite like anything else, in terms of characters or tone. And as I note, it then gets loonier and richer in Season 7: a remarkable combination. If you do give a watch, I'll be curious to know what you think.

      Delete
  4. Well, hello there. I feel like I have to do a long backstory to explain how I got here but I am afraid it might be boring, but you love TV, so I guess I'll give it a shot.

    About two weeks ago, I had occasion to browse Stuart Margolin's credits. I don't recall now what got me thinking about him, but it was something like "He looks so familiar, like I know him really well, but I can't place him . . . " I was looking through his imdb credits and recognized nothing until I got to "Love, American Style!" OH! He was that guy who was in the little front skits. (I never watched the Rockford Files much, so that wasn't the stronger association)

    So that got me on a nostalgia kick and I watched a few episodes of LAS. I was 8 when it ended, so I can't believe my parents let me watch it, but on re-view, I can see that most of the jokes would have gone over my head. And it was sweet, mostly. Sometimes stupid, but mostly lighthearted fun. In one episode, Burt Reynolds is a husband home from the army and having a conversation with his wife and after a long back story regarding a picture of Grace Kelly he has with him she inquires, "What kind of man would carry a picture of Rock Hudson in his wallet?"

    I spit out my beverage. Rock Hudson's sexuality was not publicly known at the time, but apparently it was an open secret in Hollywood. So, was that on purpose by the writers, or had they simply chosen the name of a movie star at random? I have to think it was intentional--but at the time the audience wouldn't have gotten the REAL joke.

    That was a little side-note to my main narrative so back to that--watching LAS got me thinking about the sort of show that changed the stars every week and that got me thinking about "The Love Boat," and my nostalgia wanted to see the episode I remembered that was my favorite, with Jane Curtin having a romance with a plumber. Wow, youtube is great--you can find practically anything you want! So then i watched a few episodes of TLB and one guest star was David Groh and again I had that "I know him really well from somewhere . . . " and I went to his imdb page and "Oh yeah! That's Joe from Rhoda!" So then I read his wikipedia page and it had this discussion of how the ratings plummeted after they broke them up so I googled "Why did Joe and Rhoda break up" and got a list of articles, including yours. I'd had some vague memory that Valerie Harper was "difficult," but today I dismiss that as the typical old anti-feminist bullshit from the past. You notice how it's never the male actors who are difficult? They are demanding and exacting and dedicated to their craft--only women are described as difficult.

    So that's how I found your page. And what a fantastic article! I love a long, analytical read, as I am not at all analytical. I have no idea why I like what I like, so it's nice to have it explained, lol

    I really enjoyed reading that, so I went to the main page and found this article. I mostly loved Newhart, but interestingly, the things I disliked about it are the things you hold up as really great. I only ever saw it on first run, so my memory wasn't too clear, but I did recall that I stopped watching at some point but did come back for the finale. So while reading the above with your mentions of "Cupcake on my Back" I thought I'd give it a look and my reaction was "Really? This is funny?" I hated watching Michael be shamed and humiliated and Stephanie being unconcerned and selfish, and his acting, while I see what you meant about his line delivery, was thrown into phony for my by his fact crying. And then when you discussed how the rest of the season went, I think this episode is actually when I stopped watching because I don't recall anything else you mentioned.

    --there's more coming; apparently i wrote too much to fit in one comment, lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Part II --

      Here's where I'm not analytical, but I'll give it a shot. I don't like watching people suffer? I don't think poverty is funny? Is that what I don't like? I'm not sure, but I didn't find that episode funny at all.

      In preparation for writing this (I've been up since 3 a.m. with tummy trouble, lol) I tried to think of other examples of things on sit-coms that really put me off, or things that I thought were really funny. Like, I hated when Joe and Rhoda broke up. I hate awful characters like Carla from Cheers. She's not funny--she's just rude. There is a common trope when something really great will be about to happen to the characters on a sit-com and it is snatched away at the last minute, of course. I don't like that. Really? Ross and Rachel together can't be funny?

      So I am thinking, is my taste really lightweight and pedestrian? But I like dark and edgy stuff too, so that can't be it. The funniest thing I've ever seen (as I think about it right now--it could change) is "A Fish Called Wanda." The horrible character in that is hilariously horrible, Mr. Manfredjensinjin, not just horrible. My favorite sitcom of all time, that I watch over and over is . . . "As Time Goes By" but that's British so does it even count? That was a great show until they got slapstick in the final bits.

      What was I even talking about? OH! So I'm reading this essay and you say things like, "The first season, . . . was shot on videotape. . . . The show reverted to film (far friendlier to Newhart’s soft-spoken style)" and I am thinking, "WHAT? Why would the medium used to record the show make any difference to the comedy?" I've heard things like that before--i have no idea what it means. And you mention somewhere else about the number of cameras used. Huh? What does that mean? lol, as I said, I am not analytical.

      The closest I got to understanding it was an episode of Scrubs where they changed the lighting to mimic an older sit-com style and the story was lighthearted, but was dark in their traditional lighting. But aside from tone, why would the camera or film or lighting make a difference in the comedy?

      So, this was my long-winded and insomnia-fueled article about my reaction to sit-coms and the whole thing can be boiled down to the tl:dr of "I love your blog!"

      Oh, one last thing--the single funniest thing that ever happened on a sit-com was the reveal at the end of the Newhart finale. I will fight you on that. Can you think of any show today that could do that and KNOW that EVERY viewer would immediately "get-it?"

      Carry on--I need to crash, lol

      Delete
    2. I should proofread, lol

      "was thrown into phony for my by his fact crying" was supposed to read "was thrown into phony for me by his fake crying."

      And although my body is crashing, my brain is racing. I keep trying to think of things I thought were really funny and all I can think of is Rachel running into the coffee house in her wedding dress. And then when they are watching the videotape and Rachel starts telling the "hiking outside Barcelona" story. And when Rachel couldn't find Joey in the hotel room. Why can't I think of anything but stuff from Friends? And why do they all involve Rachel? My brain is losing it now, too, lol

      Delete
    3. I’m so glad you found my blog, so happy you enjoyed my 'Rhoda' essay, and so delighted you were moved to comment. I don’t know, you seem pretty analytical to me, especially for someone up with digestive issues in the wee hours of the morning. :)

      The specific way I chose to frame “Cupcake on My Back” is that “the show is more alive than it’s been in years.” I stand by that. For me, Season 7 brings a stagnant series back to life I absolutely understand why it might not be to someone else’s tastes, but it most assuredly is to mine, and I think the aspiration and the accomplishments are remarkable. I don’t see the episode at all as you do. Yes, midway through, Michael is shamed and Stephanie is self-absorbed, but I don't find it fair to judge an episode (or the characters themselves) by their statuses midway through a journey, when they're deliberately, by design, showing the worst sides of themselves; by the time they break up, at episode's end, it’s about Michael being noble and decent and wise and Stephanie being heartbroken and vulnerable, and I think that’s more character development than we’ve seen out of them in five years. I think it’s glorious.

      I like when things are shaken up. I’d like to see writers and actors working outside their comfort zone, or devoting themselves to forging something new. I think that’s a thread that runs through my blog, from 'Rhoda' Season 3 to 'Maude' Season 2, from 'Voyager' Season 4 to 'Criminal Minds' Season 8 — and it's most assuredly true of 'Newhart' season 7.

      BTW, I think there are shades of gray in terms of what you're discussing. I love Joe and Rhoda’s break-up. But I too can’t stand Carla on 'Cheers.' I have a feeling she may be one of the elements that kept me from watching all those years. And I absolutely despise the 10 years of will-they/won’t-they with Ross and Rachel on 'Friends.' Obviously the writers thought it’s how they could best sustain interest (and a long run), but it annoys me no end. It makes whole seasons of the series unwatchable for me now. I was so happy when Monica and Chandler were paired in Season 5, and the writers just left them together — and whatever adversities befell them, they stayed together and kept being funny. So I think you and I have quite a lot of common ground here.

      Except perhaps on 'Newhart.' I return to Season 7 again and again, and it consistently gives me the same level of pleasure — a level of pleasure that no other season gives me. (I think my husband might well call it his favorite sitcom season of all time, and not because the daring of the design, but because he finds it riotously funny.) The only place that gives me pause is Michael’s breakdown, and I was quick to outline my feelings at the time, that perhaps it wasn’t someplace I wanted to see a sitcom go. But I see it differently now. I saw differently by the second time I watched it in 1989, which was, I think, 20 minutes after the *first* time I watched it. I applaud the artistry and originality and, above all, Scolari’s performance. Nowadays, of course, sitcoms typically mix in soap opera elements, and characters are given to suffer semi-weekly, so it doesn’t seem nearly as daring as it did then. But I stand by my conviction that Michael’s downward spiral in Season 7 rejuvenates the show, and is glorious to witness. As you phrase it, I will "fight you on that." :) Besides, we don’t need to fight about the 'Newhart' series finale. Yeah, it is easily one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen — or at least the cleverest.

      Delete
    4. Thank you so much for your reply--and I am glad I came across as articulate. I wasn't feeling it this morning! I suddenly realized that I had read this whole essay thinking "best version of itself" meant "funniest," but your comment makes me think that's not what you meant at all. Perhaps "most solid," or "revealing," or "smart" might be better terms for how I should have read it. That makes more sense. Sometimes characterization goes flying out the window and becomes a Flanderization as a series goes on--Newhart didn't do that.

      I have been reading other entries today as I recuperate, and commenting here and there. But I am saving anything Star Trek related for when I feel super-sharp, as that is my most-beloved territory. I am so looking forward to it!

      And if you ever feel like doing a post explaining the camera and film stuff, that would be great! You explain things so well I might finally get it!

      Delete
    5. As much fun as I have writing these essays, I think I have just as much fun reading the comments, and interacting with the folks who leave them, so it’s such a delight to have you posting here. (I pretty much always respond to comments, but I don’t always manage to do so right away, so if you don’t hear something from me immediately, check back in a week.)

      I often write these giant essays, and then someone will chime in saying, “How could you not discuss…” — and I’ll suddenly realize there’s a whole aspect of the season I’ve forgotten to discuss. So I make lots of mistakes here! I think you’re correct to call me to task a bit on my use of the word “best“ without any explanation. It’s funny: when I first started this blog, I was keeping everything deliberately and aggressively subjective. I would call things “my favorite“ instead of “the best,” and constantly say things like “in my opinion,“ and “as far as I’m concerned.“ But it got exhausting after a while, and besides, I throw so much of myself into these essays that I think folks know now that they’re purely an expression of me, and just my subjective thoughts expressed as fact. And in terms of the Newhart essay, I sort of got to my topic sentence at the very end, and maybe that was an odd way to write it. By “the very best version of itself,” I was trying to say what I said at the very end: “nuttier and richer” — and perhaps I should’ve said that sooner. And I stand by that. I think the show gets loonier, and I think the characterizations get deeper -- a wonderful and unusual combination -- and for me, that makes it the best version of itself. But I’m not sure I wasn’t misleading by saving my topic sentence till the very end, and it’s something I’ll consider in the future.

      In the meantime, I hope you’re feeling better. I myself am feeling like crap today, but when I’m a little stronger, I’ll tell you what I know about video vs. film and three camera sitcoms, which will not be much, but might be helpful. :)

      Delete
  5. I think everyone being hung up on Suzanne Pleshette is partly why Mary Frann was given nothing to do.

    I think making her more like Eva Gabor's character in season 7 (where she fits in with the oddballs worked well).

    I also saw Mary Frann in interviews..and she was naturally funny so I was curious why the show took so long to tap into that...and I think it boils down to the creator (who said in so many words she was miscast). I also saw the creator off Newhart created Coach..and he had the same issue with Christine (he had hired Shelley Fabares...a proven comic actress...and the show never gave her much to work with)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Omigosh, I would’ve loved to have seen that interview with Barry Kemp where he basically said that Mary Frann was miscast. As you said, that explains so much. It really just takes a minor adjustment in Season 7 to make her wonderfully funny; what irony that it took a pair of new showrunners — with no prior experience with the show — to recognize her potential. As you said, that was clearly a common Kemp failing. I was not a ‘Coach’ viewer, but obviously, Fabares could be a comic sparkplug when given the right material.

      It’s funny: when I tweeted about this essay, I had so many people respond by saying how much they loved Mary Frann. She didn’t get a lot of love at the time (even the critics – or perhaps more accurately, especially the critics – were so obsessed with Pleshette), but I think those last few seasons of ‘Newhart’ especially made people remember her very fondly.

      Delete
    2. The creator said that the original version of Joanna was more like Stephanie..and they made the decision to make her character less shallow and more likable.

      And he said Mary Frann auditioned a few times wearing the same sweater and he asked her why (he wasn't sure if she didn't own anything else) and she said she wanted to be memorable so she wore the same thing each time.

      Mary Fran is the one person that wore all the 80s styles well lol

      Delete
  6. I saw the interview with Barry Kemp on YouTube (it’s part of the Academy of Television interview series) where he disparaged Mary Frann. I thought it lacked class. And was inaccurate. Frann was a warm and likable presence and a capable comic actress.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, that is truly appalling: a show’s creator bad-mouthing a member of the cast. When Jayson mentioned it above, I was tempted to check it out, but now: definitely not. I don’t need to see that. As you said, it’s so crass and misguided. (It’s also sort of ironic to hear Kemp make pronouncements about Newhart, when the show didn’t really blossom into a critical hit till after he left.) I wouldn’t say that Frann was a comedic *force* the way the others in the Newhart cast were, but as you say, she was warm and likable on screen, and when she was allowed to go for the laughs, she always nailed them. It’s just sad that it took a changing of the guard in Season 7 for her to get the kind of showcases she deserved.

      Delete